Hungarian Economy
ZoOm Hungary

Hungary has made the transition from a centrally planned to a market economy, with a per capita income nearly two-thirds that of the EU-28 average. In 2010 the government implemented a number of changes including cutting business and personal income taxes, but imposed ’crisis taxes’ on financial institutions, energy and telecom companies, and retailers. 

In late 2008, Hungary's impending inability to service its short-term debt – brought on by the global financial crisis – led Budapest to obtain an IMF/EU/World Bank-arranged financial assistance package worth over $25 billion. The global economic downturn, declining exports, and low domestic consumption and fixed asset accumulation, dampened by government austerity measures, resulted in a severe economic contraction in 2009. In 2010 the new government implemented a number of changes including cutting business and personal income taxes, but imposed ’crisis taxes’ on financial institutions, energy and telecom companies, and retailers.

Hungarian Economy

Since 2010, the government has backpedaled on many economic reforms and taken a more populist approach towards economic management. The government has favored national industries and government-linked businesses through legislation, regulation, and public procurements. In 2011 and 2014, Hungary nationalized private pension funds, which squeezed financial service providers out of the system, but also helped Hungary curb its public debt and lower its budget deficit to below 3% of GDP, as subsequent pension contributions have been channeled into the state-managed pension fund. Hungary’s public debt (at 74.5% of GDP) is still high compared to EU peers in Central Europe. Real GDP growth has been robust in the past few years due to increased EU funding, higher EU demand for Hungarian exports, and a rebound in domestic household consumption. To further boost household consumption ahead of the 2018 election, the government embarked on a six-year phased increase to minimum wages and public sector salaries, decreased taxes on foodstuffs and services, cut the personal income tax from 16% to 15%, and implemented a uniform 9% business tax for small and medium-sized enterprises and large companies. Real GDP growth slowed in 2016 due to a cyclical decrease in EU funding, but increased to 3.8% in 2017 as the government pre-financed EU funded projects ahead of the 2018 election.
 
GDP (purchasing power parity):
$321.869 billion (2019 est.)
$307.778 billion (2018 est.)
$291.995 billion (2017 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 54

GDP (official exchange rate): $163.251 billion (2019 est.)
4.58% (2019 est.)
5.44% (2018 est.)
4.45% (2017 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 60

GDP – per capita (PPP):
$32,945 (2019 est.)
$31,485 (2018 est.)
$29,832 (2017 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 54

GDP – composition by sector:
agriculture: 3.9% industry: 31.3% services: 64.8% (2017 est.)

Labor force:
4.414 million (2020 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 85
Labor force – by occupation:
agriculture: 4.9% industry: 30.3% services: 64.5% (2015)
Unemployment rate:3.45% (2019 est.)

Agricultural products:
wheat, corn, sunflower seed, potatoes, sugar beets; pigs, cattle, poultry, dairy products

Industries:
mining, metallurgy, construction materials, processed foods, textiles, chemicals (especially pharmaceuticals), motor vehicles

Exports: $91.6 billion (2016 est.) Country comparison to the world: 36
Partners: Germany 28.2%, Romania 5.2%, Slovakia 5%, Austria 4.9%, France 4.8%, Italy 4.8%, Czech Republic 4.2%, Poland 4.2% (2016)

Imports: $85.78 billion (2016 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 36
Partners: Germany 26.3%, Austria 6.4%, China 6.3%, Poland 5.5%, Slovakia 5.3%, Netherlands 4.9%, Czech Republic 4.9%, France 4.8%, Italy 4.8% (2016)

Reserves of foreign exchange and gold:
$28 billion (31 December 2017 est.)
$25.82 billion (31 December 2016 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 52

Public Debt:

73.6% of GDP (2017 est.)
76% of GDP (2016 est.)
Country comparison to the world: 43